Vinylstudio vs audacity vs5/26/2023 ![]() ![]() If you need to burn a CD, say, or perhaps save your tracks in a different format, they're just a couple of mouse-clicks away.Īll of VinylStudio's editing tools are non-destructive, which means that, instead of changing your original recordings, VinylStudio leaves them alone and applies your changes when you save your tracks. This means that your recordings are always easy to get to, should you ever need them. Instead, it stores them in a list, organised by artist and album title. ![]() Tim C.Ĭonvenience: Unlike most similar programs, VinylStudio does not expect you to keep track of your recordings as individual files. I have been wanting to digitise my vinyl collection for years and finally got the loan of a USB turntable so revelling in hearing albums - some of which I have had for nearly 50 years! Your software is making a significant contribution to my enjoyment. Really enjoying working with this bit of software - bought yesterday, such an improvement on Audacity - and am finding it very user friendly. And popup 'rollover' help is available throughout the program to help you get started. Moved a trackbreak by accident? No problem. Most operations in VinylStudio can be undone (and redone), making VinylStudio a productive and forgiving working environment. Carol E.Įase of use: Because it is designed for the job at hand, VinylStudio is much easier (and faster) to use than conventional audio editors.įor example, instead of having to save each track separately, you tell VinylStudio the names of your tracks (or, if you are lucky, look them up), tell it where the trackbreaks are (by dragging markers into position) and then tell it to save your tracks. Well done also with your customer support. The instructions are clear and simple but the program is so intuitive I hardly needed them. A lot of work has gone into making VinylStudio easy to use while retaining the power and flexibility you need to get the best out of your album collection. It would be great, if some of you could try to replicate the experiment, and confirm or deny my result.Here is a brief rundown of some of the things that make VinylStudio special. Well, then I probably had an expectation, which may have biased the result. Thus I went back to the computer, restored a copy of the original album recording and did the comparison side by side. When I listened to an album over lunch, however, it did not sound 'right' to my ears, as in: like I remembered it. Or am I struck by expectation bias? But originally, I only expected the normalized file to play louder - which it did. in the Exaktbox, not the DSM? This would explain a difference. But I remember, that the DAC is upsampling the original signal before its converted. Is the gain / attenuation applied to the upsampled signal - i.e. rounding errors, tethering?), the result is hard to understand. As I do not know, how exacly this is done (e. It looks to me like adding gain (or less attenuation?) to the input signal by the DSM is less harmful than adding gain to the data set by Vinyl Studio in the first place. Maybe, the 'beware of digital attenuators' fraction has some point here. ![]() When I made a comparison, trying to compensate the volume difference, the non-normalized files appeared to sound a tiny bit better (as in musical) to me. ![]() Now it's getting weird, and/or right, despite my objection: I still had a few of the original files in the waste bin of my computer, and ran them through Vinyl Studio again, with -3 db nomalization. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |